Security

Tragedies like to awaken in people Realengo the compulsive need to do something. It is absolutely legitimate. It's instinct for self-protection. It turns out that this "something" takes too long the debate is in danger of losing focus.
Some argue that the appropriate response to the deaths is a new campaign for disarmament. The premise is mathematically logical. If there are firearms in circulation there is no way to kill someone with a firearm.
Every determinant of zero matrix is ​​zero.
Stay for the reader to judge the realism and effectiveness of the proposal. But, even there?What to do when there are guns in circulation? Nothing?
There is an agenda earlier in the realm of public safety. As there are still weapons in circulation, there is also need for prevention and protection against criminals and would-be criminals armed with firearms. It seems logical?
On the day of the massacre wrote that the country needs and will find resources to make our schools a safer place for our children.
I said "safer", not "completely safe". There is no solution that eliminates 100% chance of a massacre as the Royal one. But that should not be an excuse for failure.
In extreme situations it is always prudent and teaching from a personal angle. I am a father like any other. If I have the right to call for my son to a school where it is reasonably safe, why deny the same right to all the fathers and mothers in this country?
Even more so now. How crazy were not totally jealous of the sudden fame achieved by the coward who shot children in Rio?
Over the weekend, experts tried to convince us that there is nothing to improve security on the ground, that everything was a fatality. Increase surveillance in schools would be ineffective and even harmful.Really?
It is the habit of thinking that if you do not have good must refrain from keeping the good.
The great, as is known, is the worst enemy of good.
Since the distrust of experts. But I suspect respect.I wonder where their children study.
I bet there is in schools where no one enters without being disturbed, and carrying guns and bullets in a bag.
Our experts are at risk of being like some education authorities, the people who spend money hand over fist to pound that public schools are going even better.
But enroll their children and grandchildren in good private schools. Those in which no one passes through the entrance without a good reason and without proving that it is not a threat.

Alon Feuerwerker